<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Great Amortals Review	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-amortals-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-amortals-review/</link>
	<description>Award-winning &#38; New York Times-bestselling author and game designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Forbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-amortals-review/#comment-51766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Forbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=2644#comment-51766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve learned to trust your opinion on many matters, Marco. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve learned to trust your opinion on many matters, Marco. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marco @ Angry Robot		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-amortals-review/#comment-51765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marco @ Angry Robot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=2644#comment-51765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Matt - &lt;i&gt;Kop&lt;/i&gt; is well worth a read but loses its way somewhat in the third act; I&#039;m biased but I&#039;d suggest &lt;i&gt;Amortals&lt;/i&gt; is better :-) -- Marco]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8211; <i>Kop</i> is well worth a read but loses its way somewhat in the third act; I&#8217;m biased but I&#8217;d suggest <i>Amortals</i> is better 🙂 &#8212; Marco</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mforbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-amortals-review/#comment-51763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mforbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 15:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=2644#comment-51763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[Bloggery] Great Amortals Review: http://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[Bloggery] Great Amortals Review: <a href="http://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-" rel="ugc">http://www.forbeck.com/2010/12/29/great-</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
