<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gibson on Futures and Writing	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.forbeck.com/2010/06/09/gibson-on-futures-and-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/06/09/gibson-on-futures-and-writing/</link>
	<description>Award-winning &#38; New York Times-bestselling author and game designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 04:50:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JMcL63		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2010/06/09/gibson-on-futures-and-writing/#comment-48265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JMcL63]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 01:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=2197#comment-48265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That second bit is really good. I&#039;m forever suggesting that this book or that film is about something in the real world and people oh so often reply to the effect that you could hardly expect the creator to be thinking about such and such. To which my stock reply has always been about the creator&#039;s subconscious has internalised the contemporary drama of the real world, then reconstructed it and represented it refracted through their fictional imaginations. It&#039;s really neat to see Gibson echo this. Perhaps I should learn that quote by heart so that I can spout it at will! :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That second bit is really good. I&#39;m forever suggesting that this book or that film is about something in the real world and people oh so often reply to the effect that you could hardly expect the creator to be thinking about such and such. To which my stock reply has always been about the creator&#39;s subconscious has internalised the contemporary drama of the real world, then reconstructed it and represented it refracted through their fictional imaginations. It&#39;s really neat to see Gibson echo this. Perhaps I should learn that quote by heart so that I can spout it at will! 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
