<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Good-Bye Gen Con So Cal	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/</link>
	<description>Award-winning &#38; New York Times-bestselling author and game designer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:43:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Forbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-8549</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Forbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-8549</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll look forward to seeing you there, Marcy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look forward to seeing you there, Marcy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Forbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-49151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Forbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-49151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll look forward to seeing you there, Marcy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll look forward to seeing you there, Marcy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcy		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-8546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:32:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-8546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s too bad.  Anaheim&#039;s not a bad drive from here and we had plenty of babysitters.  Ah, well, guess I&#039;ll just have to take the plunge and go to the original this year.  ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s too bad.  Anaheim&#8217;s not a bad drive from here and we had plenty of babysitters.  Ah, well, guess I&#8217;ll just have to take the plunge and go to the original this year.  😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Marcy		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-49150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marcy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 01:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-49150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s too bad.  Anaheim&#039;s not a bad drive from here and we had plenty of babysitters.  Ah, well, guess I&#039;ll just have to take the plunge and go to the original this year.  ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s too bad.  Anaheim&#8217;s not a bad drive from here and we had plenty of babysitters.  Ah, well, guess I&#8217;ll just have to take the plunge and go to the original this year.  😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Forbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-8388</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Forbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-8388</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confident that Peter explored many options to keep Gen Con So Cal going, and he said as much in his open letter. I agree that the dates were often a problem, especially in the first year, but they moved earlier—and got better—each year. A number of conventions were announced in the wake of E3&#039;s downsizing, so you may have some hope, at least on the electronic front.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confident that Peter explored many options to keep Gen Con So Cal going, and he said as much in his open letter. I agree that the dates were often a problem, especially in the first year, but they moved earlier—and got better—each year. A number of conventions were announced in the wake of E3&#8217;s downsizing, so you may have some hope, at least on the electronic front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Forbeck		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-49149</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Forbeck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 21:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-49149</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confident that Peter explored many options to keep Gen Con So Cal going, and he said as much in his open letter. I agree that the dates were often a problem, especially in the first year, but they moved earlier—and got better—each year. A number of conventions were announced in the wake of E3&#039;s downsizing, so you may have some hope, at least on the electronic front.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confident that Peter explored many options to keep Gen Con So Cal going, and he said as much in his open letter. I agree that the dates were often a problem, especially in the first year, but they moved earlier—and got better—each year. A number of conventions were announced in the wake of E3&#8217;s downsizing, so you may have some hope, at least on the electronic front.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-8387</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-8387</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm...maybe the high costs of the Anaheim convention center, as well as it&#039;s non-central location, contributed to its lack of success.  That and the fact that it doesn&#039;t take advantage of any natural vacation period.

Not to be snide, but with E3 folding as well this just leaves the local events which are good, but I was really jazzed about the ways the gaming industry could use the Los Angeles area.  Especially with mid-season TV pickups (Dresden files and Sci Fi&#039;s new Flash Gordon Series).  Maybe partnering with G4.  I don&#039;t think that ideas to expand the con have been fully explored and I actually believe he is kind of copping out.

As for Indy, it it a great central US location and I wish the con well.  I will probably attend next year, but I am still a little bitter that he couldn&#039;t make SoCal work.

I also fully acknowledge that it isn&#039;t completely, or even largely, Peter&#039;s fault.  We also have a dearth of good game stores, etc.

I am just rambling and looking for synergy that could have kept the con here.  But Thursdays before winter break aren&#039;t the best planning in my opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;maybe the high costs of the Anaheim convention center, as well as it&#8217;s non-central location, contributed to its lack of success.  That and the fact that it doesn&#8217;t take advantage of any natural vacation period.</p>
<p>Not to be snide, but with E3 folding as well this just leaves the local events which are good, but I was really jazzed about the ways the gaming industry could use the Los Angeles area.  Especially with mid-season TV pickups (Dresden files and Sci Fi&#8217;s new Flash Gordon Series).  Maybe partnering with G4.  I don&#8217;t think that ideas to expand the con have been fully explored and I actually believe he is kind of copping out.</p>
<p>As for Indy, it it a great central US location and I wish the con well.  I will probably attend next year, but I am still a little bitter that he couldn&#8217;t make SoCal work.</p>
<p>I also fully acknowledge that it isn&#8217;t completely, or even largely, Peter&#8217;s fault.  We also have a dearth of good game stores, etc.</p>
<p>I am just rambling and looking for synergy that could have kept the con here.  But Thursdays before winter break aren&#8217;t the best planning in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://www.forbeck.com/2007/01/28/good-bye-gen-con-so-cal/#comment-49148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jan 2007 20:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.forbeck.com/?p=826#comment-49148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmm...maybe the high costs of the Anaheim convention center, as well as it&#039;s non-central location, contributed to its lack of success.  That and the fact that it doesn&#039;t take advantage of any natural vacation period.

Not to be snide, but with E3 folding as well this just leaves the local events which are good, but I was really jazzed about the ways the gaming industry could use the Los Angeles area.  Especially with mid-season TV pickups (Dresden files and Sci Fi&#039;s new Flash Gordon Series).  Maybe partnering with G4.  I don&#039;t think that ideas to expand the con have been fully explored and I actually believe he is kind of copping out.

As for Indy, it it a great central US location and I wish the con well.  I will probably attend next year, but I am still a little bitter that he couldn&#039;t make SoCal work.

I also fully acknowledge that it isn&#039;t completely, or even largely, Peter&#039;s fault.  We also have a dearth of good game stores, etc.

I am just rambling and looking for synergy that could have kept the con here.  But Thursdays before winter break aren&#039;t the best planning in my opinion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;maybe the high costs of the Anaheim convention center, as well as it&#8217;s non-central location, contributed to its lack of success.  That and the fact that it doesn&#8217;t take advantage of any natural vacation period.</p>
<p>Not to be snide, but with E3 folding as well this just leaves the local events which are good, but I was really jazzed about the ways the gaming industry could use the Los Angeles area.  Especially with mid-season TV pickups (Dresden files and Sci Fi&#8217;s new Flash Gordon Series).  Maybe partnering with G4.  I don&#8217;t think that ideas to expand the con have been fully explored and I actually believe he is kind of copping out.</p>
<p>As for Indy, it it a great central US location and I wish the con well.  I will probably attend next year, but I am still a little bitter that he couldn&#8217;t make SoCal work.</p>
<p>I also fully acknowledge that it isn&#8217;t completely, or even largely, Peter&#8217;s fault.  We also have a dearth of good game stores, etc.</p>
<p>I am just rambling and looking for synergy that could have kept the con here.  But Thursdays before winter break aren&#8217;t the best planning in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
