I will say this though, the way IP law works companies are “required” to act with due diligence to protect their product identity. That is what I believe is going on here.

Besides, looking at the Battlez site the game looks interesting.

As I said the title logos may be similar, but I don’t believe similar enough, but the marketing and branding looks very different to me. I don’t believe there is any way one could look at the Level 1 Trainer box of battlez and mistake it for Battle Dice or vice-versa.

I would also like to add that I hate to see potential fans build animosity toward a product because of agressive ip protection practices. I watched fans angrily call TSR “T$R” because they protected their ip. I have watched reaction against White Wolf (from close friends who LARP).

Let’s see what happens, hope the case is resolved amicably, and root for both games. Root for Matt’s game a little more, but that’s a given on this forum.

I will say this though, the way IP law works companies are “required” to act with due diligence to protect their product identity. That is what I believe is going on here.

Besides, looking at the Battlez site the game looks interesting.

As I said the title logos may be similar, but I don’t believe similar enough, but the marketing and branding looks very different to me. I don’t believe there is any way one could look at the Level 1 Trainer box of battlez and mistake it for Battle Dice or vice-versa.

I would also like to add that I hate to see potential fans build animosity toward a product because of agressive ip protection practices. I watched fans angrily call TSR “T$R” because they protected their ip. I have watched reaction against White Wolf (from close friends who LARP).

Let’s see what happens, hope the case is resolved amicably, and root for both games. Root for Matt’s game a little more, but that’s a given on this forum.